Should we humans expand significant resources to try to save another species from extinct?
I don’t believe we should unless it affects our own survival. Of course animals become extinct because of changes in the environment. Any environmental change which is sever enough to cause the extinction of an animal species, is very likely to affect us.
If you could pick one animal now extinct to bring back which would it be?
My first choice would not be a T-Rex.
I will pick Microraptor, a small, feathered dinosaur, which could fly or glide, and is perhaps the earliest ancestor of birds. A flying dinosaur is pretty cool to begin with and this would helps us to understand how flight developed and likely settle the question are birds just evolved dinos.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microraptor
Save the Frogs Day – April 28th.
The Save the Frogs web site is trying to make the public more aware of the world wide threat to the amphibian species we share our world with.
Of course frogs are only one of many species facing extinction. What concerns me more is that frogs are a ”bioindicator” of the environment. If the changes to the environment are sever enough to threaten the world wide population of frogs, it is very likely to have a significant impact on our own survival.
“Most frogs require suitable habitat in both the terrestrial and aquatic environments, and have permeable skin that can easily absorb toxic chemicals. These traits make frogs especially susceptible to environmental disturbances, and thus frogs are considered accurate indicators of environmental stress: the health of frogs is thought to be indicative of the health of the biosphere as a whole. Frogs have survived in more or less their current form for 250 million years, having survived countless ice ages, asteroid crashes, and other environmental disturbances, yet now one-third of amphibian species are on the verge of extinction. This should serve as an alarm call to humans that something is drastically wrong in the environment.”

4 comments
Comments feed for this article
April 29, 2009 at 11:16 am
Indian Lake Papa
I haven’t a clue which animal to bring back – actually, as I think about it, there are a few in existence – like mosquito’s, we could do without!
April 29, 2009 at 6:13 pm
edfromct
What would happen to all the people who make, and sell, pest control products if there were no mosquitoes?
I am more concerned with the politicians in Washington sucking the blood out of us then I am of mosquitoes.
April 29, 2009 at 11:43 pm
lovewillbringustogether
Australian Scientists are seriously considering bringing back the Tasmanian Tiger – a marsupial predator we wiped out by the early part of last century. ( after a mere 100 years or so of white colonisation of a continent.
I’d bring back the Dodo!
I am also tempted by the idea of bringing back Neanderthal Man, giving him machine guns and nuclear tactical weapons and hope he could wipe out his succcessor and see if we can get it a bit better the next time ’round.
As for the froggy alarm call: it SHOULD – but man is far to ‘clever’ to be worried enough to change because of some dumb animal who can’t adapt as fast as we think we can.
It’s a Dark Glass thing
<B
April 30, 2009 at 12:56 am
edfromct
I think the Dodo would be a great bird to bring back. It’s the ancestor of many of our politicians.
There is a video of the last Tasmanian Tiger, penned up in a cage. Very sad to watch.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6vqCCI1ZF7o
When the aliens from outer space come and take over we will be the ones in the cages.